There is a sentence that gets very little respect in discussions like the ones on this forum: "I don't know."
Believers often feel it concedes too much. Sceptics often feel it lets the other side off the hook. So instead we get certainty — in both directions — that the evidence rarely seems to justify.
My own view is that "I don't know" is not a failure. It is what honest accounting looks like when the numbers don't yet add up either way. The discomfort, I suspect, comes from somewhere more personal than logic: uncertainty feels like exposure. Like you haven't done your homework, or like something important is being left unresolved.
But unresolved is sometimes just accurate.
So I want to ask: what question are you currently sitting in, without an answer? Not looking for resolution here — just curious whether people find the not-knowing easier or harder than they expected, and what makes it so.